Women who crossed into Ceuta during the mass arrival on 30 July have described sleeping outdoors while fearing harassment and assault. Spain’s largest police union has recorded 15 sexual assaults of varying severity since that date, with the significant majority of victims reported to be minors.
The crisis has already generated arguments over borders, asylum, policing and Spanish migration policy. The women facing sexual violence inside it risk becoming secondary to every one of those debates.
The Numbers Keep Rising
Ceuta’s public prosecutor received 13 sexual-assault cases between 30 July and 17 August, most involving people who were not residents of the city. Human Rights Watch reported that emergency doctors had treated two women and six girls for sexual assault or rape in that period, including girls aged 11 and 14.
Separately, a 10-year-old girl was allegedly targeted on a city street in mid-August by three people described as brothers, an incident that remains under investigation.
In three cases detailed by judicial authorities, the alleged perpetrators were Moroccan men who had also entered during the mass crossing. Two of the men were remanded in custody, and a third was ordered expelled.
Women sleeping near the overcrowded CETI reception centre said they feared approaching toilets alone because of harassment, describing men who followed them at night. The centre was housing about 700 people despite a capacity of roughly 500.
Outrage Becomes Selective
Spain’s Equality Ministry did warn early that migrant women faced “extreme risk”, and feminist organisations have rejected accusations that they deliberately ignored the assaults. Campaigners have said that feminists who condemned the violence were themselves attacked online for discussing the cases.
That complicates any simple claim of silence, since the issue has not gone entirely unaddressed.
Yet the relative absence of a large, sustained mobilisation remains noticeable compared with cases of sexual violence that have dominated demonstrations and social media in Spain before. Part of the hesitation is understandable, since crimes involving migrants are rapidly exploited by anti-immigration movements, creating pressure to avoid supplying material for collective blame.
But refusing collective blame does not require minimising individual crimes, and the two goals are not actually in conflict.
Victims Not Inconvenient
Feminism loses credibility when the identity of an alleged perpetrator appears to affect how confidently violence against women can be discussed. The victims in Ceuta are themselves migrants, frequently young, homeless and dependent on overwhelmed public systems.
Their vulnerability, if anything, should make them harder to ignore rather than easier. Human Rights Watch has called for urgent shelter and access to asylum procedures for everyone still living unsheltered in the enclave.
Migration policy and sexual violence can be discussed simultaneously. Governments can provide asylum safeguards, reject xenophobia and still insist that assault is prosecuted regardless of the nationality or immigration status of either victim or suspect.
A credible defence of women cannot depend on the perpetrator fitting the preferred political narrative. The women sleeping outside Ceuta’s reception system deserve the same outrage as anyone else.
Keep up with Daily Euro Times for more updates
Read also:
How Disinformation and Panic Overwhelmed Ceuta
Morocco Shows It Can Close the Ceuta Border
Morocco Edges in on Spanish-Controlled Sahara Airspace
