The Vatican has now said openly what it had long tried to avoid. On 1 July, the Society of St Pius X ordained four new bishops at its seminary in Econe, Switzerland, despite a direct papal appeal sent just two days earlier in which Pope Leo XIV had written: “I plead with you and ask you with all my heart: please turn back.”
Some 17,000 people from 70 countries attended the outdoor ceremony. On 2 July, the Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith declared the act schismatic and confirmed the automatic excommunication of the six bishops involved, all SSPX priests and any lay Catholics who formally adhere to the group. The result is the first major rupture of Pope Leo’s pontificate.
This was never simply about personnel. The ceremony was held exactly 38 years after Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who founded the SSPX in 1970, performed the same act in the same location. Lefebvre was excommunicated in 1988 alongside the four bishops he ordained; Pope Benedict XVI lifted those excommunications in 2009 in a failed effort at reconciliation. The SSPX, which has around 600,000 members and 700 priests worldwide, has since remained in what the Vatican calls a “canonically irregular” status.
The SSPX Wanted More Than Delay
The Society of St Pius X has lived in a tense semi-detached state from Rome for decades.
It rejects key elements of the Second Vatican Council, defends the older Latin liturgy and views much of modern Catholic reform as rupture rather than renewal. For years, successive popes tried to keep open some path back, balancing warnings with limited concessions: Pope Francis allowed SSPX priests to hear confessions validly in 2015 and to officiate at recognised marriages in 2017. By proceeding with the ordinations, the SSPX effectively chose clarity over ambiguity, signalling that it believes it has enough institutional weight, followers and global network to survive open rupture.
Pope Leo, for his part, seems to have decided that ambiguity had become more dangerous than punishment. If Rome did not act, papal authority would start to look optional in exactly the area where Catholic order says it cannot be optional. Father Davide Pagliarani, the SSPX’s superior general, told the crowd in Econe that the group does not accept “false priests representing false religions” and that every Vatican sanction “will have no validity.” That is not the language of a faction seeking negotiation. It is the language of a parallel institution.
This Is About More Than the Latin Mass
It would be easy to frame the dispute as another culture-war clash over liturgy.
That is too narrow. The deeper issue is whether the Church can accommodate factions that no longer merely prefer older forms, but increasingly deny the legitimacy of the post-conciliar Church itself. At that point, the problem stops being one of taste or nostalgia. It becomes constitutional. Canon 1387 is explicit: any bishop who consecrates another without a pontifical mandate, and any bishop who receives such consecration, incurs automatic excommunication reserved to the Holy See. The law was clear. The SSPX proceeded anyway.
The schism has wider resonance, especially in the United States and parts of Europe where hardline traditionalism increasingly overlaps with nationalist politics. Rome is not only facing liturgical resistance; it is facing a style of Catholic rebellion that treats submission to central authority as weakness when that authority sounds too modern, too open or too universal. Pope Leo is not just punishing dissent. He is drawing a line against an alternative church logic, and the question is who inside the broader Catholic right quietly decides that line was drawn in the wrong place.
A Small Schism with Larger Consequences
The SSPX is still a minority current within global Catholicism.
It will not replace Rome. But schisms are not measured only by size. The Vatican has already sent communications to bishops worldwide outlining steps to welcome back those who wish to leave the SSPX, suggesting Rome expects some of the group’s 600,000 followers to reconsider now that the break is formal. Pope Leo’s response suggests he wants to be remembered as a pope of unity, but not unity at any price.
That may strengthen him in the short term. It may also harden the rebel identity of those already convinced that modern Rome has betrayed the faith. Either way, the old middle ground is shrinking. The Vatican has now said the breach aloud. The question is no longer whether a schism is possible. It is how far this one travels, and who inside the Church quietly decides it speaks for them.
Keep up with Daily Euro Times for more updates
Read also:
Pope Leo XIV Returns Augustine to Algeria
Cardinal Robert Prevost: A New Era for the Catholic Church
Al-Sharaa Seeks Support in Meeting with Christian Clerics
