June16 , 2026

Spain’s War on Clocks: Time to End This Twice-Yearly Ritual?

Related

Sagrada Família Nears Completion, Homes face Demolition 

Sagrada Família Nears Completion, Homes face Demolition Keywords: Sagrada Família, Barcelona, Glory Façade, Pope Leo, housing, Gaudí Brief: Stone towers above apartment roofs; a narrow street meeting a monumental façade.The Sagrada Família's near-completion is a triumph of persistence, but the unresolved Glory Façade dispute keeps turning celebration into an argument about homes and urban justice.Pope Leo XIV held Mass at the Sagrada Família on Wednesday and offered his formal blessing to the Tower of Jesus Christ, making it the world's tallest church at 172.5 metres, overtaking Ulm Minster in Germany. The ceremony fell exactly 100 years after Antoni Gaudí's death, and fireworks lit up the Barcelona skyline as crowds gathered beneath the basilica's newly completed central spire. The tower itself had been structurally finished on 20 February; Wednesday's ceremony was its inauguration by the 11th pontiff to reign since the project broke ground in 1882. Reuters, AP, and Euronews all treated it as one of the architectural events of the year. The harder question lies a few streets away. All 18 towers are now structurally complete, and the full interior is open to visitors. But the Glory Façade, designed as the basilica's grand main entrance and considered the most complex element of Gaudí's original plan, remains under construction and is estimated for completion between 2034 and 2035. At its centre sits a monumental staircase still caught in an unresolved urban planning dispute with Barcelona city authorities. Some proposals linked to the staircase could require demolition of residential buildings directly across from the basilica's entrance. Completion Is Not the End The staircase is not a decorative detail. It would connect the Glory Façade's elevated entrance to street level while allowing traffic to pass beneath, a solution the Construction Board describes as technically necessary but which residents and city officials have not yet approved. The dispute has intensified as the basilica's public profile has peaked. For residents, the lack of certainty about what demolition, if any, will be required is itself the problem: they have been living under the uncertainty of an unfinished nineteenth-century vision for decades, and the celebration above does not resolve the planning question below. This matters because Barcelona is not an empty museum. It is a living city in which monumental ambition still has to negotiate with residents, streets, and housing pressure. The closer the basilica comes to completion, the more urgent it becomes to ask whether finishing Gaudí's final vision should still be allowed to displace present lives in a dense modern neighbourhood. The Papal Visit Changes the Mood, Not the Facts Pope Leo's blessing matters symbolically because it wraps the basilica in spiritual endorsement at the moment its image is most triumphant. He called it an "architectural masterpiece." Euronews described the ceremony as the culmination of a historic public celebration. The visit also coincides with a centenary of Gaudí celebrations across Barcelona, with exhibitions and cultural events honouring the architect's legacy throughout 2026. That ceremonial weight is real, and it makes any remaining obstacle look, from a distance, like obstruction rather than a legitimate civic question. Once a building becomes a near-sacred symbol of national and religious pride, the neighbours who resist elements of its completion risk looking selfish by comparison. That imbalance is precisely why the housing issue matters. A masterpiece does not automatically justify everything done in its name. A Triumph with an Asterisk The Sagrada Família deserves admiration. Its endurance, craftsmanship, and symbolic power are extraordinary, and this week's milestone is genuinely historic. But historical grandeur does not remove the moral complication at the project's edge. Barcelona can celebrate the nearing completion of Gaudí's masterpiece whilst still asking what a twenty-first-century city owes to the people who live in the path of an unfinished nineteenth-century vision. The church may be approaching the finish. The argument around it plainly is not.Keep up with Daily Euro Times for more updates! Read also: Southern Europe Drying: How Real Is the Water Crisis? Roman Angel Resembling Meloni Painted Over Shattered Ceasefire: Lebanon Reports Hundreds of Israeli Breaches

Mediterranean Demographic Squeeze of the Coming Decade 

On the day Europe's most extensive migration overhaul takes effect, birth rates on both Mediterranean shores are falling and a workforce gap is widening.

Ageing Societies Slow Science’s Edge

Ageing societies do not only strain pensions and healthcare. They may also make science less bold, less disruptive, and more incremental over time.

Strategic Autonomy: How the UAE Chose to Self-Arm

Under real Iranian missile fire, the UAE learned that state security cannot be outsourced, and it has kicked off the Gulf's most ambitious arms build-up.

Idlib to Bamako: The Real Differences in Jihadist Power

Africa’s jihadist groups are gaining territory and pressure, but they still lack the cohesion, legitimacy, and state collapse that made HTS’s seizure of Damascus possible.

Share

Pedro Sánchez declared on 20 October that Spain will ask the European Union to scrap daylight saving time.

The Spanish Prime Minister made it clear: there is no point any longer. His government plans to bring this proposal to the European Council with a single aim, ending what Madrid calls an outdated ritual.

The announcement comes at a recognizable moment. This weekend, people across Europe will turn clocks back by one hour, knowing that 66 per cent of Spaniards support dropping the time change for good.

Europe Already Voted Against Clock Changes

Madrid’s proposal does not break new ground for the EU. Back in 2018, the European Commission launched a public consultation after nearly four million voiced support. Of those who responded, 84 per cent wanted to stop clock changes.

The European Parliament approved an end to time switching in 2019 with a vote of 410 to 192.

From there, the process halted. The proposal ran aground with the Council because member states couldn’t come to consensus. Some wanted summer time to be permanent; others pushed for winter time. Brexit landed. Covid-19 changed everything. The war in Ukraine drew attention elsewhere.

Six years later, twice-yearly time changes persist.

The Original Reasons Have Disappeared

Spain’s government argues that economic progress, technological growth, and updated social habits have made this habit irrelevant. The practice began in Europe in 1980 with the idea that the clock switch would reduce energy use.

That time has passed. Modern lighting, flexible work, and new technology have canceled out the old justifications. Updated studies show very limited potential for energy savings. The German Environment Agency summarized that true energy savings cannot be pinned down because less use in some areas is wiped out by greater use in others.

In spring and autumn, more heating is needed during chilly mornings. The supposed evening electricity savings don’t make up the shortfall.

Health Evidence Builds Against Time Changes

Science now speaks clearly on the health consequences.

Clinical neurophysiologist Óscar Ramon Sans Capdevila remarked that changing clocks disrupts everyone’s rhythm. Studies confirm that it upsets biological clocks, causes extra stress, and leads to short-term health woes.

Sánchez emphasised that science now agrees this practice fails to save energy and instead disrupts people’s natural rhythms twice a year. The evidence about harmful effects grows for both northern and southern parts of Europe.

Data shows drowsy drivers lead to more accidents in the days that follow a clock switch. Sleep loss, irritability, and weaker immune systems follow these disruptions, according to medical experts.

Poland and Finland Back Spain’s Initiative

Spain is not alone in restarting this debate. During a recent EU energy meeting, only two other countries spoke up in support. A Polish diplomat was hopeful that time could be found to analyze the evidence and build a case for ending the practice. A Finnish diplomat echoed Spain’s view, expressing regret that the issue comes up only in October and May.

European Commissioner for Energy Dan Jørgensen restated that Brussels stands in favour of ending clock changes. He promised a new analysis would begin and voiced confidence that action is ahead.

Spain’s Minister of the Presidency Félix Bolaños explained that Spain wants to keep discussions open on details. Madrid aims to build agreement, not insist on keeping either summer or winter time all year round.

Spain  Daily Euro Times's War on Clocks: Time to End This Twice-Yearly Ritual?
Spains War on Clocks Time to End This Twice Yearly Ritual

Six Years of Democratic Will Ignored

The 2018 polling remains the EU’s most successful consultation.

4.6 million people responded, sometimes representing a significant slice of a nation. Germany saw 3.79 per cent of its population weigh in. Austria’s rate was 2.94 per cent.

Parliament listened. The Commission listened. The Council held back.

Member states asked for a broader impact assessment before moving ahead. Then the pandemic hit and the whole topic faded from view. There is still no date for a decision.

Democracy, voiced by millions, deserves more than endless paperwork. The one-hour clock shift continues because the Council’s position remains unresolved.

Europe Must Choose

Spain comes to the table with a practical fix. Madrid contends that ending daylight saving time would align Europe better with daily routines. The proposal seeks a Europe that works for people and not for clocks.

Teresa Ribera, European Commission vice president and former Spanish government vice president, noted that with no further clock changes, Spain would most likely settle on winter solar time. Other countries would decide based on geography and public preference.

That diversity should not hold up progress. The EU already runs coordinated time changes. It could just as easily coordinate permanent time zones. Places at similar latitudes could align, and neighbours could agree on practical solutions.

Otherwise, Europe risks sticking with a system millions reject, lacking scientific support, and creating clear health challenges every spring and autumn. Energy savings no longer offer a valid reason.

Listen to Citizens Finally

Sánchez argued that valuable policy starts by listening to citizens and to science, then weaving those lessons into law. Six years ago, the EU asked what people wanted. The answer was clear. Science has delivered its conclusion. What the Council still lacks is political resolve.

Madrid plans to press the issue at the next EU Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council meeting. The government hopes to phase out the practice by 2026, giving countries time to coordinate and adjust travel services.

Two out of three in Spain and five out of six across the EU have said they want this change. If popularity means anything in Europe, the Council should finally act on the will shared in 2018.

Keep up with Daily Euro Times for more updates! 

Read also:

Spain Overtakes Japan: Services Economy Writes New Economic History

Spain: Adiós Relaxation, Hello Red Tape

Foreigners Under Fire by Spanish Tax Hikes

Your Mirror to Europe and the Middle East.

We don’t spam! Read more in our privacy policy