The operator of an oil tanker stranded in the Gulf recently received a proposal that was difficult to refuse. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, through a front company, offered an Iranian naval escort through the Strait of Hormuz, at a price. That price starts at roughly $1 per barrel of crude, payable in Chinese yuan – or stablecoins.
At least two vessels have reportedly completed yuan-denominated transits, with fees for some tankers reaching $2 million per crossing. The Strait carries one-fifth of globally traded crude oil and liquefied natural gas, and its effective monetisation by the IRGC places the post-war financial architecture of global energy trade under visible strain.
Brussels Acts, With Its Own Reasons
Three days after Bloomberg’s report, Germany and Italy circulated a joint discussion paper among EU working groups, proposing a “kill switch” for foreign stablecoins.
Under the draft provisions, the European Banking Authority would be required to ban a stablecoin outright if its reserve transfer mechanism fails, if the issuer seriously breaches its home-country rules or if there is evidence it is acting against EU token holders’ interests.
The document states: “To ensure the stability and sovereignty of the EU financial system, it is imperative to establish a comprehensive and harmonized regulatory framework for global stablecoins from third-country multi-issuance schemes.”
The calendar invites a causal reading. The evidence, read carefully, points to a different one. The EU’s European Systemic Risk Board had already called for stablecoin safeguards by end-2026, well before the Hormuz operation.
Germany and Italy are folding those recommendations into the bloc’s ongoing Market Integration and Supervision Package negotiations before the legislative window closes.
The underlying concern – that a stablecoin issued jointly by a US firm and an EU firm, with reserves partly held in a US bank account, could be delayed or blocked by American rules in a liquidity crunch – predates Tehran’s arithmetic by months. What the Hormuz toll system has done is render that pre-existing European concern legible on the front page.
All Roads Lead Back to the Greenback
The dollar’s footprint in the stablecoin market is nearly total. Ninety-nine percent of stablecoins in circulation are denominated in US dollars.
Jan-Oliver Sell, chief executive of Qivalis, a euro-denominated stablecoin backed by a consortium of 12 major European banks including ING, UniCredit, and BBVA, warned that without a liquid euro available on blockchain infrastructure, “the only alternative is the U.S. dollar. That’s a real risk to Europe’s financial and digital sovereignty.”
Global stablecoin annual transfer volumes reached $18.4 trillion in 2025, surpassing legacy giants Visa and Mastercard combined. Stablecoins have graduated from crypto speculation to core financial infrastructure.
What the Hormuz toll system adds is a concrete proof of concept for what dollar-independent rails enable in geopolitical practice. The currency structure is deliberate. Yuan settles outside the SWIFT-dependent dollar clearing system entirely, while stablecoins technically reference dollar value but transfer on blockchain rails that bypass correspondent banking.
OFAC has been pressing stablecoin issuers for years precisely because digital tokens that reference the dollar’s value while operating on dollar-independent infrastructure represent a gap in Western financial leverage. Iran’s Hormuz operation has run a live trial of that gap, at scale.
A Race Between Two Regulatory Clocks
The United States signed the Generating and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act in 2025 to regulate payment stablecoins. The US Treasury published proposed implementation rules on 1 April, opening a 60-day comment period, with full operationalisation expected no earlier than November 2026.
The Germany-Italy proposal requires the European Commission to issue a formal equivalence determination of each stablecoin operator’s home-country regulatory framework before EU regulators grant market access.
Washington built the GENIUS Act to attract stablecoin issuers. Brussels built MiCA to control them. Those are different objectives, and the EU is unlikely to treat them as equivalent. Dollar stablecoin operators may effectively find the European market closed to them for the foreseeable future.
Europe’s Sovereignty, Europe’s Choice
The EU’s kill switch proposal is a defensible financial reflex, and the underlying logic is sound.
The harder question is what Europe builds next. A euro-denominated digital infrastructure, liquid, MiCA-compliant, and globally accessible, would give European businesses and their trading partners something genuinely useful: a credible digital settlement layer independent of both dollar and yuan rails.
Stablecoin adoption spreads through individual preference rather than government mandate, because people in countries like Argentina, Nigeria, and Türkiye want access to stable currency – a process running independently of government policy.
The dollar’s share of global central bank reserves has fallen to 56 percent, a 30-year low. Gold surged past $5,500 per ounce, a reading taken at the central bank level about the durability of existing monetary arrangements.
Europe’s kill switch protects European savers from a real vulnerability. A euro on blockchain rails, backed by the weight of EU bank consortia, would do something more: it would give Europe’s neighbours a reason to treat the euro as a partner currency rather than a secondary dollar. That is the version of European monetary sovereignty worth building toward.
Keep up with Daily Euro Times for more updates!
Read also:
Crypto Crash: Gamification of Digital Assets
West Hunts Russian Crypto Laundering as Networks Shift to Kyrgyzstan
Encrypted: Cryptocurrency as Legal Tender in the U.S.
