July14 , 2026

‘Clean Them Out’: Amman and Cairo Respond to Trump

Related

Is Farage Heading for the Dustbin?

Nigel Farage quit Parliament to fight a rubbish-bin mascot for his own seat, wagering that grievance beats scrutiny in the court of public opinion.

Attal Uses Clavicular to Redefine His Political Brand

When a presidential candidate attacks an American streamer for mocking France, the influencer arena stops being parallel to politics and starts becoming part of it.

Buried Circle in Scotland Rewrites Violence Before Rome

Scotland's Buried Circle Rewrites Violence Before Rome Keywords: Neolithic Scotland, Machrie Moor, conflict, stone circles, archaeology, Roman Britain Brief: Standing stones in moorland mist; a bronze blade laid beside excavated earth.New discoveries at Machrie Moor and a major Edinburgh exhibition are pushing Scotland's prehistory away from pastoral myth and closer to a landscape of ritual, memory and organised violence.Scotland's ancient past is often imagined in stone, fog and silence. The newest archaeology suggests something noisier. Historic Environment Scotland this week announced the detection of a possible new prehistoric ring beneath the peat on the Isle of Arran: a circle of 12 pit-like anomalies forming a feature approximately 28 metres across, with space for two additional settings that may bring the original total to 14 posts or stones. Led by Dr Nick Hannon, the survey team used geophysical scanning equipment that detects underground disturbances without lifting a single turf. "The discovery of a new circle completely surpassed our expectations," Dr Hannon said. The find arrives at the same moment as the National Museum of Scotland opens Scotland's First Warriors, an exhibition tracing 4,000 years of conflict from the Neolithic to the Romans, covering more than 200 objects and asking how and why people fought, what weapons they used and what early conflict did to communities. Taken together, the two stories complicate the old image of early Scotland as a remote edge of prehistory waiting passively for civilisation to arrive. Ritual and Conflict Shared the Same Landscape It is tempting to separate ceremonial monuments from warfare, as if one belonged to religion and the other to politics. The new exhibition suggests prehistoric Scotland did not organise life so neatly. Machrie Moor's circles date from between roughly 3500 and 1500 BCE, and excavations have shown that several were preceded by timber circles in the same positions. The timber circle at Machrie Moor 1 has been radiocarbon-dated to 2030 ± 180 BCE, before the wooden posts were replaced with stone around 2000 BCE. The circles align with a prominent notch at the head of Machrie Glen, where the midsummer sunrise would have been visible, and later served as burial grounds for cremations and inhumations. The Edinburgh exhibition changes the emotional map of prehistoric Scotland. Stone circles were not necessarily built by peaceful mystics untouched by danger. They belonged to societies capable of both ceremony and force, burial and battle, symbolic order and lethal dispute. As the exhibition makes clear, interpersonal violence, fortification and organised conflict were real parts of Scotland's deep past, not marginal episodes but structural features of life on the moor. The landscape was never only sacred space. It was lived space. Before Rome, There Was Already History The most useful thing about these discoveries is that they pull Scottish prehistory out of the shadow of Rome. Too often, Britain's northern story begins when classical writers notice it. The Arran circle and the "first warriors" frame both insist that Scotland already had long, structured histories of monument-building, territorial meaning and conflict before Roman contact ever entered the picture. The Arran cursus, a ceremonial enclosure approximately 1.1 kilometres long sitting adjacent to the stone circles, underlines the landscape's sustained importance as a gathering place across millennia. The new ring at Machrie Moor has not yet been excavated, and the evidence for prehistoric violence remains open to interpretation. But the direction of travel is clear. Early Scotland looks less like an empty northern fringe and more like a dense world of ritual landscapes, armed communities and social memory stretching back 5,000 years. The stones were never mute. We are only getting better at hearing what kind of world they belonged to.Keep up with Daily Euro Times for more updates! Read also: The Outlander Effect: How the Show Put Scotland on the Map Rural Europe Pushes Back Against Megafarms Homer in a Mummy Rewrites Cultural Borders

Sahel Grows Increasingly Hostile Towards Foreign Powers

Rebel fighters push deeper into northern Mali as Sahel rulers sever old alliances and gamble on defending their territory alone.

Europe vs. America: The World Cup’s Hidden Culture War

A racist jibe, a disputed red card and a peace prize have turned the 2026 World Cup into an unlikely stage for transatlantic tension.

Share

Arab Condemnation

In January 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump proposed to resettle Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to neighbouring countries such as Egypt and Jordan in order to “cleanse” the region. This proposal was met with a backlash from the international community, especially from Egypt and Jordan, which have categorically rejected such an initiative.

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

The Gaza Strip has been the epicentre of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for decades, which remains unresolved to this day. Population density, economic blockade, and periodic military clashes create unbearable conditions for the region’s residents. In this context, Trump’s proposal to resettle Palestinians was perceived as a radical measure aimed at changing the demographic situation in the region.

Egypt’s Reaction

Egypt, which shares a border with Gaza, strongly rejected Trump’s proposal. 

Egypt’s Foreign Ministry said the country supports the Palestinian people’s right to live on their land and rejects any attempt to displace or annex the territory. The statement stressed that such actions threaten the stability of the region and undermine the prospects for peace and coexistence.

Egyptian authorities also expressed concerns that the resettlement of Palestinians could have long-term consequences, including the creation of permanent refugee camps that could become bases for armed groups.

Jordan’s Reaction

Jordan, a country whose national identity overlaps between those who identify as Jordanian and Palestinian, also rejected Trump’s proposal of resettlement. 

Jordanian Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Ayman Safadi stressed that Jordan will not accept any plans to relocate Palestinians on its territory at this time. 

Population Transfer: An Idea of Fringe Politics

The proposal to relocate Palestinians from Gaza reflects a long-standing idea among the right-wing factions of Israeli and American politics to resolve the Palestinian issue through population transfer. 

Relocating Palestinians is judged as a violation of their right to self-determination and could lead to the destabilisation of either country as well as the neighbouring region. 

Egypt and Jordan, as key countries in the Middle East region, made it clear that their position emphasises the importance of finding a peaceful and just solution based on respect for the rights of the Palestinian people and the principles of international law alongside two-states on the borders pre-1967.

A Pathway to Peace: Two-State Solution

Egypt and Jordan’s rejection of Trump’s proposal underscores the importance of respecting Palestinian self-determination and the risks of regional destabilisation. The plan, seen as a violation of international principles, underscores the need for a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Stay tuned to Daily Euro Times for the latest insights!

Explore more articles:

How New Zealand Changed the Film Industry?

Russia and the UAE Agree 10% Tax Rate

Greenland Not for Sale: Denmark Rejects Trump’s Offer

Your Mirror to Europe and the Middle East.

We don’t spam! Read more in our privacy policy