July14 , 2026

Trump of Arabia: Deepening Ties with the GCC

Related

Is Farage Heading for the Dustbin?

Nigel Farage quit Parliament to fight a rubbish-bin mascot for his own seat, wagering that grievance beats scrutiny in the court of public opinion.

Attal Uses Clavicular to Redefine His Political Brand

When a presidential candidate attacks an American streamer for mocking France, the influencer arena stops being parallel to politics and starts becoming part of it.

Buried Circle in Scotland Rewrites Violence Before Rome

Scotland's Buried Circle Rewrites Violence Before Rome Keywords: Neolithic Scotland, Machrie Moor, conflict, stone circles, archaeology, Roman Britain Brief: Standing stones in moorland mist; a bronze blade laid beside excavated earth.New discoveries at Machrie Moor and a major Edinburgh exhibition are pushing Scotland's prehistory away from pastoral myth and closer to a landscape of ritual, memory and organised violence.Scotland's ancient past is often imagined in stone, fog and silence. The newest archaeology suggests something noisier. Historic Environment Scotland this week announced the detection of a possible new prehistoric ring beneath the peat on the Isle of Arran: a circle of 12 pit-like anomalies forming a feature approximately 28 metres across, with space for two additional settings that may bring the original total to 14 posts or stones. Led by Dr Nick Hannon, the survey team used geophysical scanning equipment that detects underground disturbances without lifting a single turf. "The discovery of a new circle completely surpassed our expectations," Dr Hannon said. The find arrives at the same moment as the National Museum of Scotland opens Scotland's First Warriors, an exhibition tracing 4,000 years of conflict from the Neolithic to the Romans, covering more than 200 objects and asking how and why people fought, what weapons they used and what early conflict did to communities. Taken together, the two stories complicate the old image of early Scotland as a remote edge of prehistory waiting passively for civilisation to arrive. Ritual and Conflict Shared the Same Landscape It is tempting to separate ceremonial monuments from warfare, as if one belonged to religion and the other to politics. The new exhibition suggests prehistoric Scotland did not organise life so neatly. Machrie Moor's circles date from between roughly 3500 and 1500 BCE, and excavations have shown that several were preceded by timber circles in the same positions. The timber circle at Machrie Moor 1 has been radiocarbon-dated to 2030 ± 180 BCE, before the wooden posts were replaced with stone around 2000 BCE. The circles align with a prominent notch at the head of Machrie Glen, where the midsummer sunrise would have been visible, and later served as burial grounds for cremations and inhumations. The Edinburgh exhibition changes the emotional map of prehistoric Scotland. Stone circles were not necessarily built by peaceful mystics untouched by danger. They belonged to societies capable of both ceremony and force, burial and battle, symbolic order and lethal dispute. As the exhibition makes clear, interpersonal violence, fortification and organised conflict were real parts of Scotland's deep past, not marginal episodes but structural features of life on the moor. The landscape was never only sacred space. It was lived space. Before Rome, There Was Already History The most useful thing about these discoveries is that they pull Scottish prehistory out of the shadow of Rome. Too often, Britain's northern story begins when classical writers notice it. The Arran circle and the "first warriors" frame both insist that Scotland already had long, structured histories of monument-building, territorial meaning and conflict before Roman contact ever entered the picture. The Arran cursus, a ceremonial enclosure approximately 1.1 kilometres long sitting adjacent to the stone circles, underlines the landscape's sustained importance as a gathering place across millennia. The new ring at Machrie Moor has not yet been excavated, and the evidence for prehistoric violence remains open to interpretation. But the direction of travel is clear. Early Scotland looks less like an empty northern fringe and more like a dense world of ritual landscapes, armed communities and social memory stretching back 5,000 years. The stones were never mute. We are only getting better at hearing what kind of world they belonged to.Keep up with Daily Euro Times for more updates! Read also: The Outlander Effect: How the Show Put Scotland on the Map Rural Europe Pushes Back Against Megafarms Homer in a Mummy Rewrites Cultural Borders

Sahel Grows Increasingly Hostile Towards Foreign Powers

Rebel fighters push deeper into northern Mali as Sahel rulers sever old alliances and gamble on defending their territory alone.

Europe vs. America: The World Cup’s Hidden Culture War

A racist jibe, a disputed red card and a peace prize have turned the 2026 World Cup into an unlikely stage for transatlantic tension.

Share

Donald Trump is back as President of the United States and countries in the Middle East are preparing their interactions with his administration.

His last term left a lasting mark on the region, reshaping alliances and sparking new initiatives: namely the Abraham Accords. With his return to the White House, regional leaders brace for another wave of transformation.

Many regional leaders familiar with his earlier term anticipate a more nimble  and flexible  U.S. foreign policy.

GCC Ties with Trump’s Administration

With  Trump’s return, the Gulf states are set to deepen their ties with Washington. 

GCC states perceive his administration’s emphasis on transactional diplomacy and deal-making as an opportunity to enhance their influence on a regional and global scale. GCC states are interested in innovations in all sectors, particularly technology, renewable energy, and infrastructure development as the GCC seeks to diversify their economies and guarantee future competitiveness.

Saudi Arabia: Strengthening Bonds and Pursuing New Opportunities Under Trump

Riyadh’s relationship with Trump is  historically strong, shaped by mutual interests that foster security and economic ties. During Trump’s first term, Riyadh valued his withdrawal from the Iran JCPOA nuclear deal and the imposition of sanctions on Tehran.

As Trump returns, the Kingdom will likely seek security guarantees and advanced military technology, potentially as a precursor to normalising relations with Israel under the Abraham Accords framework. It will also request enhanced support for its Vision 2030 initiatives as Saudi megaprojects, such as NEOM, face funding obstacles.

The UAE and Bahrain

The UAE and Bahrain, key players in the Abraham Accords, are expected to deepen their collaboration with Israel and the U.S. under Trump. 

These nations benefited from Trump’s facilitation of peace agreements, which supported their international standing and opened new economic and technological partnerships. 

With Trump’s return, there is potential for the further expansion of the Accords, possibly including Saudi Arabia or other GCCmembers.  The UAE, in particular, may push for increased U.S. investment in its giant tech and green energy sectors, aligning with its long-term strategic goals, whilstoffering a promising economic future for the region.

Qatar: Strengthening U.S. Ties Through Investment and Reconciliation

Qatar’s relationship with the U.S. improved during Trump’s first term.

Trump’s administration played a role in facilitating the 2021 reconciliation and Qatar will likely aim to build on this improved dynamic. Qatar’s significant investments in the U.S. could serve as a foundation for strengthening bilateral ties as Trump prioritises business over policy. 

Trump’s broader Middle East policies this time around will likely shape efforts to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. His “Peace to Prosperity” plan, which focused on economic incentives for Palestinian territories while sidelining political leadership, could remain central. 

Despite scepticism from Palestinian leaders, Trump’s strong ties with Israel and regional powers like Saudi Arabia and the UAE will continue to add to his diplomatic leverage over either side. Implementing this plan could significantly impact the dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Navigating U.S. Strategy and Regional Tensions

Gulf states are likely to align closely with Trump’s approach. The Gulf Cooperation Council members may push for greater coordination with Washington to counter Iran’s influence, particularly in Yemen, Iraq, and Syria. 

Variations in individual Gulf states’ strategies could complicate a unified approach. Some nations seek de-escalation to prioritise economic stability.

Donald Trump’s return to the White House is expected to reinvigorate U.S.-Gulf relations, offering opportunities and challenges.

With Donald Trump now in office, the Gulf states are poised to influence the Middle East’s geopolitical landscape significantly. Their growing impact stretches from local conflicts to international diplomacy, highlighting the importance of their relationship with the U.S. 

Keep up with the Daily Euro Times for in-depth perspectives on timely global issues!

Also read:

Europe Must Save Middle East Diplomacy From Trump’s ‘Deals’

Take Fire: Germany Enacts Laws to Shoot Down ‘Russian’ Drones

First Impressions: Trump’s Presidency in 100 Days

Your Mirror to Europe and the Middle East.

We don’t spam! Read more in our privacy policy