For decades, artistic careers have existed in precarious balance. Income fluctuated with commissions and performances, recognition arrived unpredictably, and many artists depended on secondary employment just to sustain a creative practice. Ireland has chosen a different approach.
In October 2025, Minister for Culture Patrick O’Donovan announced under Budget 2026 that the Basic Income for the Arts scheme, which had operated as a pilot since 2022, would be made permanent, making Ireland the first country in the world to embed such a scheme on a lasting basis.
Speaking at the launch in Dublin, O’Donovan described it as a “start” and expressed a desire to expand it in future: “For the first time in the history of the State, we can say that we now have, on a permanent basis, a basic income structure that will really revolutionise how we value culture and creativity.”
From Pilot to Permanent
The programme was launched in September 2022 as a response to the acute instability the pandemic exposed within Ireland’s cultural sector. Performances stopped overnight, commissions disappeared, and the fragility of artistic income became impossible to ignore. Some 2,000 artists and creative arts workers were selected at random from over 17,000 applicants across disciplines including visual art, music, writing, and theatre, and each received €325 per week with no conditions attached. Recipients were not required to produce specific work, meet output targets, or report to any institutional overseer. The state provided income and artists decided how to use it.
The pilot ran for three years, was extended by six months to February 2026, and generated a substantial body of evidence in the process. Participants spent more time on their artistic practice, produced more work, and reported significantly higher life satisfaction and reduced anxiety compared to a control group.
An external cost-benefit analysis found that for every €1 invested, society received a return of €1.39. A public survey conducted last September found 97 per cent support for making the scheme permanent. The political case had essentially been made for the government by its own data.
Creative Work Without Market Pressure
The permanent scheme has been allocated €18.27 million under Budget 2026 and will operate in three-year cycles.
Artists selected in 2026 will receive €325 per week until 2029, followed by a three-month tapering period, and will then be eligible to reapply for the subsequent cycle. Applications open in September 2026, with eligibility criteria broadened to include artistic disciplines not covered under the original pilot. The government has left open the possibility of expanding capacity to 2,200 participants if additional funding becomes available.
What distinguishes this scheme from conventional arts grants is its unconditional structure. Traditional funding models reward specific projects, favour established practitioners, and require artists to demonstrate commercial or institutional viability before receiving support. Basic income inverts this logic entirely. Financial stability arrives first, and creative decisions follow from it rather than being constrained by it. Experimental work, emerging voices, and unconventional forms, which struggle most to secure conventional funding, stand to benefit most from a system that does not ask them to justify their existence in advance.
A Different Relationship with Culture
Ireland has long treated cultural production as central to national identity rather than peripheral to economic output. Literature, music, and performance carry symbolic weight that successive governments have been willing to fund publicly, and the basic income scheme extends that tradition into new territory. It acknowledges creative work as a continuous activity rather than a series of isolated achievements, and it treats artists as participants in public life rather than clients of individual patrons or markets.
That shift has implications beyond Ireland. Countries across Europe and beyond continue to rely primarily on grants, commissions, and private funding to support artists, all of which attach conditions and introduce dependencies that constrain creative autonomy. The Irish model, by contrast, supports individuals rather than projects, accepts uncertainty as an inherent feature of creative practice, and measures success partly through wellbeing and social return rather than purely through output.
The UBI Lab Network, which monitors basic income experiments globally, was direct in its response to the announcement: “As the pilot shows, basic income works.”
Sustainability and Critics
The scheme is not without legitimate questions.
Public funding at this scale requires sustained political support and consistent budget allocation across administrations with different priorities. The €18.27 million secured under Budget 2026 is considerable, but arts funding has historically been among the first areas cut during fiscal pressure. O’Donovan’s description of the permanent scheme as “a start” signals ambition; whether future ministers share it remains to be seen.
Critics also point to the selection process. Random sampling from eligible applicants, as used in the pilot, treats all qualifying artists as equally deserving of support regardless of career stage, financial circumstances, or artistic track record. The public survey found significant division on this point: 47 per cent of respondents favoured selection based on economic need, whilst 37.5 per cent preferred selection based on artistic merit.
Random selection satisfies neither group entirely, though it does avoid the institutional gatekeeping that merit-based selection inevitably introduces.
What the Pilot Actually Found
The evidence gathered during the three-year pilot is perhaps the most important outcome of the entire experiment. Ireland ran what was, in effect, the first large-scale randomised control trial of basic income conducted by any government, with a genuine control group, longitudinal data collection, and independent cost-benefit analysis. The results were consistent and, in terms of the scheme’s stated goals, largely positive. Artists with guaranteed income produced more work, felt more professionally autonomous, experienced less anxiety, and contributed a measurable return to the broader economy.
Whether those findings translate cleanly into the permanent scheme’s three-year cycles is less certain. The pilot offered continuous support without the knowledge that it would end; the permanent scheme introduces a different psychological dynamic, with artists aware from the outset that support is time-limited and renewal requires reapplication.
How that affects creative risk-taking and long-term planning is something the scheme’s ongoing research component will need to examine.
Changing Conditions, Not Guaranteeing Outcomes
Ireland’s decision does not guarantee artistic success, eliminate competition, or resolve the deeper structural inequalities within the cultural economy. It alters the conditions under which creativity occurs, and it does so on the basis of evidence rather than ideology. Artistic careers become more sustainable, and creative labour becomes more visible as a social contribution rather than a private indulgence.
For the 2,000 artists who will receive €325 per week from later this year, the practical difference will be immediate. For the broader conversation about how societies value cultural work, Ireland has provided something rarer: a real-world answer to a question most governments have only ever been willing to ask theoretically.
Keep up with Daily Euro Times for more updates!
Read also:
Rising Star: Qatar and the MENA Art Market
British Virgin Islands Hit by FATF Grey List
Under the Radar: The Expanse of the Muslim Brotherhood in Ireland
