Renewed fighting along the Thailand-Cambodia border has pushed a regional dispute into international headlines.
Thai airstrikes on Cambodian positions, artillery exchanges and mass evacuations have raised an obvious question for winter travellers: is it still safe to go to Thailand or Cambodia at all?
The short factual answer is that the danger is local rather than national. The Foreign Office in London, like other ministries, currently advises against travel only in affected border provinces, not to Bangkok, Chiang Mai or the southern islands.
Tourism flows continue, even as hundreds of thousands of people near the frontier shelter from shelling.
A Real War, in a Narrow Strip
The current clashes form part of a long dispute over the frontier and sites such as the Preah Vihear temple.
In early December, Thai forces carried out air raids on Cambodian territory after the death of a Thai soldier, whilst Cambodia reported civilians killed and homes destroyed.
More than 500,000 people have been displaced on both sides of the 800-kilometre border. Schools and hospitals in several Thai border provinces closed temporarily, and some crossings saw evacuations and military checkpoints.
The United States and ASEAN partners have pressed for a return to an October ceasefire, but both governments trade accusations of landmines and violations. It is a serious conflict, even if it sits far from the postcards that sell Southeast Asia to visitors.
What Travel Advisories Actually Say
Travel advisories are more measured than social media suggests. The British Foreign Office and other governments warn against all but essential travel in a band close to the border, citing artillery, stray fire and unexploded ordnance.
The United States embassy has told its citizens to avoid a 50-kilometre zone along the frontier. At the same time, they state that major tourist areas remain open.
Flights to Bangkok, Phuket and Siem Reap operate normally. No large-scale attacks have targeted foreign visitors. Independent travel advisories for December still say that leisure trips to Thailand and Cambodia are possible, provided travellers stay away from the conflict zone and follow local news.
In other words, governments are not treating the entire region as a war zone. They are drawing a line between a narrow area of active fighting and the wider tourist economy.
Reading Maps from Afar
For many, the instinct is to see a headline about shelling and mentally colour an entire country red. That reaction is understandable. From afar, maps are flat, and most travellers know only the names of capital cities and beaches.
Yet the reality is always more granular. Bangkok is closer to Hanoi than to some of the affected border crossings. Islands in the Andaman Sea feel as distant from Preah Vihear as parts of Portugal feel from Ukraine.
To someone in Surin or Oddar Meanchey, that geographical nuance does not matter. To a holidaymaker choosing between Thailand and Greece, it should.
Framing the entire country as dangerous can hurt people who depend on tourism for their livelihoods without improving anyone’s safety. The harder question is not just “is it safe for me”, but “how do my choices interact with what is happening next door”.
Ethics at the Edge of a War
There is also an ethical layer. Drinking cocktails on a Thai island whilst families in a border village sleep in school gyms will feel uncomfortable to some.
Others might argue that staying away punishes small businesses in peaceful areas more than it pressures any government. People have faced similar dilemmas before.
Many kept travelling to Turkey during past periods of tension, whilst avoiding specific cities. Visitors continued to visit Morocco during Saharan tensions, or Lebanon when only certain regions were affected.
In each case, the decision was rarely purely about risk. It also reflected how close people wanted their leisure to sit to someone else’s emergency.
What the Thailand-Cambodia clashes expose is how tourism depends on invisible buffers. Tourists prefer their conflicts distant and contained. When fighting approaches recognised place names, the illusion of separation breaks.
Travelling Thoughtfully Now
For anyone still planning a trip, the practical steps are predictable. Read official advisories, check local news, and avoid border provinces where artillery is active.
Be wary of overland routes that cross the frontier, particularly near disputed temples and military zones. Package holidays may not include these areas at all; independent travellers need to check their maps more carefully.
Beyond precautions, there is space for a different kind of awareness. Tourism can feel weightless, yet it always lands somewhere.
Choosing locally owned guesthouses, listening to how people in Thailand or Cambodia talk about the situation, and avoiding insensitive behaviour online are small ways to recognise that.
The current escalation does not mean travellers must erase Thailand from their atlas. It does mean they should stop treating Southeast Asia as a single, carefree backdrop.
A real conflict is unfolding along one stretch of its border. The rest of the picture is more complicated, and more human, than a red stamp that simply says “safe” or “unsafe”.
Keep up with Daily Euro Times for more updates.
Read also:
MENA-Asia Tourism Boom: Europeans Want Sophistication, Not Just Bling
Europeans Want a ‘Secure, Easy-to-Use, and Free Digital Euro
Europe Boards Russia’s Ships: New Rules for Sea Conflict
