Last Friday, the Trump administration announced an $8.9 billion equity investment in Intel Corporation.
The deal hands Washington a 10% stake in the struggling chipmaker. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed the government’s new ownership position.
Meanwhile across the Atlantic, UK Technology Secretary Peter Kyle and OpenAI's Sam Altman discussed a £2 billion proposal. The plan would give every British citizen free access to ChatGPT Plus.
Economic Power Shifts From Market to Ministry
Previously, tech firms operated with minimal state oversight. Today’s governments actively purchase controlling interests in private companies.
Washington already bought equity stakes in rare-earth miner MP Materials and US Steel. These investments blur traditional boundaries between public and private sectors.
Data Access Becomes the Real Prize
Behind these financial arrangements lie more valuable assets than share prices suggest. Governments gain access to user data and technological capabilities.
The UK-OpenAI talks centred on public service applications. Officials could monitor citizen interactions with artificial intelligence systems.
Intel’s semiconductor designs now fall partially under federal control. Manufacturing secrets become state assets rather than corporate property.
National Security Justifies Market Intervention
Supporters argue these moves protect strategic industries from foreign competition. China’s technological advance worries Western policymakers.
State investment supposedly prevents critical companies from failing. Private markets cannot always fund necessary research and development.
Yet government ownership creates new dependencies rather than eliminating old ones. Public funds now prop up failing business models instead of allowing market forces to work.
Transparency Must Accompany State Shareholding
Citizens deserve clear information about how their tax money gets spent. Public ownership requires public accountability mechanisms.
Boards should include citizen representatives alongside government appointees. Quarterly reports must detail how state investments serve broader public interest.
Rather than letting bureaucrats negotiate in secret, parliaments should debate major equity purchases before completion. Democracy works best when voters understand where their money goes.
Tech Giants Need Genuine Partnership
Government cash comes with strings attached that may stifle innovation. Bureaucratic oversight often slows decision-making processes.
European policymakers should consider alternative approaches to Silicon Valley dominance. Supporting domestic startups might prove more effective than buying into American corporations.
Keep up with Daily Euro Times for more updates!
Read also:
A Paper Tiger: Why EU Tech Keeps Arming Myanmar’s Junta
Palantir’s European Expansion: Tech Dependence Wrapped in Security
Delayed Gratification, No More: France’s Fintech Boom
