Once sold to protect innocent lives, American weapons now flow through social media platforms like a twisted marketplace from hell.
The modern arms trade has moved to social media platforms. Iranian-backed arms dealers in Yemen now sell Kalashnikovs, pistols, and grenade launchers on X (formerly Twitter). During the middle of Sana’a’s bustling streets, dealers operate from Houthi-controlled regions with shocking openness.
American weapons originally sold to regional partners have ended up in the hands of al Qaeda-linked fighters and Iranian-backed rebels. The cycle repeats endlessly.
How Western Weapons Fuel Regional Instability
Originally designed to stabilise regions, Western arms sales have become the foundation of new conflicts. Military equipment flows through official channels before reaching secondary markets. These weapons inevitably leak into unintended hands.
Recently supplied weapons get sold by militias and army units. All sides in the conflict seized weapons during battles and from Yemeni army stockpiles. Weapons deemed surplus flow to arms dealers and third parties.
The Digital Arms Trade Transforms Conflict
Social media has revolutionised how weapons spread across borders. Iranian weapons supplied to the Houthis may end up in Somalia. Arms dealer networks operate from Sana’a with global reach.
The “Merchant of Death” Viktor Bout, released from American custody in 2022, returned to selling arms to Yemen’s Houthis. His network demonstrates how arms dealers exploit post-conflict power vacuums.
Regional Powers Enable Weapons Proliferation
Iran continues supporting the Houthis’ weapons development. While the Houthis have made strides in developing indigenous arms production, their arsenal remains reliant on support from Iran.
Russian involvement complicates the situation further. Viktor Bout’s talks with the Houthis show that Moscow has few limits. Regional powers compete by proxy through weapons supplies.
Critics Point to Legitimate Defence Needs
Some observers maintain that arms sales serve legitimate defence purposes.
The State Department follows a holistic approach when reviewing arms transfer decisions. Officials weigh political, social, human rights, civilian protection, economic, military, nonproliferation, technology security, and end use factors.
Arms transfers and defence trade serve as important U.S. foreign policy tools. They carry potential long-term implications for regional and global security. Supporters claim proper oversight prevents misuse.
Track Record Shows Oversight Failures
The evidence tells a different story. U.S. arms killed civilians in Yemen according to multiple reports. The resulting humanitarian crisis has claimed over a hundred thousand lives from military conflict, famine, and disease.
Current oversight mechanisms fail to prevent weapons diversion.
Immediate Action Needed on Multiple Fronts
Western governments must impose comprehensive sanctions on arms smuggling networks.
The United States already sanctioned one individual and three companies that facilitated weapons procurement for the Houthis. Similar actions need scaling up.
Social media platforms require regulation to prevent weapons sales. Arms dealers currently advertise openly on X without consequences. Platform owners must monitor and remove weapons-related content.
Arms export licences need stricter end-use monitoring. Current systems allow weapons to reach unintended recipients. Suppliers must track weapons throughout their operational lifespan.
The Human Cost Demands Urgent Response
Arms dealers in Sana’a advertise assault rifles next to family photos on social media. Viktor Bout brokers weapons deals from Moscow to Yemen.
American precision munitions flow through black markets across the Horn of Africa.
Keep up with Daily Euro Times for more updates!
Read also:
Red Sea, Red Lines: America’s Maritime Security Dilemma
Smuggled and Forged: The Houthis’ Shadow Economy
Houthis Recruit Military Yemenis for Russian Frontlines in New Development
